It is important to make it clear that the scientific text should not only represent a mere repetition of previously constructed arguments. It is possible, and in most desirable, that the construction of the student-researcher's argument refute established theses. This, of course, with substantive arguments. Not enough simple "look" in the opposite direction Monografias Prontas.

It is therefore important to stress that, from the academic point of view, to be debated can never have in jurisprudential decisions or understandings doctrine an imprecise obstacle. Thus, the student-researcher must be aware of the elaboration of a type of text that is very recurrent in legal monographs, usually composed of a historical chapter, the second chapter contemplating the jurisprudential and doctrinal positions contrary to that which is intended sustain and, finally, the third chapter based on favorable positions Monografias Prontas.
Note that structures like this will tend to repeat critical construction.